Missouri Governor Mike Kehoe’s
recommended state budget for the 2027 fiscal year is not final. The state
House of Representatives and
Senate will debate it, change it, and ultimately pass their own version. Still, the Governor’s proposal matters because it sets the tone for the conversation in the state capital.
Here are a few items KSD is watching closely:
-
Foundation Formula - Early budget recommendations indicate that the school funding formula could come in $190 million below the level recommended by the state’s Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE). If that happens, districts across Missouri may face tougher decisions about how to maintain services and plan responsibly for the future.
-
Transportation - A proposed reduction in transportation funding could affect the resources available to support bus routes and daily operations.
-
Depleted Budget Reserves - The budget plan appears to lean heavily on one-time reserves, which can create short-term relief but make long-term planning harder, especially for high, ongoing costs like staffing, supplies, and student support services.
There is also significant discussion around tax policy, including proposals connected to phasing out Missouri’s state income tax and shifting toward a more consumption-based model. The key point is that tax policy decisions affect how much revenue the state can reliably collect year after year. Stable, predictable revenue is what makes stable, predictable school funding possible.
Several proposals being discussed would change how property taxes work in Missouri. While these ideas vary a lot, some would reduce revenue for local taxing entities over time, including public schools. Because Kearney School District is supported by a mix of state and local funding, any major changes to local revenue structures are important to track carefully.
What this means for Kearney
When state funding becomes less predictable, it increases pressure on local budgets. It can also make it harder to recruit and retain employees in a competitive market, because compensation and staffing decisions often require multi-year planning.
If the state’s long-term revenue picture changes significantly, it can impact future support for public education, including the foundation formula and transportation. Changes can also shift even more pressure to local revenue sources.
If proposals reduce or constrain local revenue growth over time, it can affect the district’s capacity to keep pace with inflationary costs while maintaining strong programs and competitive employee compensation.